Source evidence
Quote, document, record, or structured input.
Defensible output
MCOS preserves the evidence behind consequential outputs: source material, deterministic facts, calculations, validation results, policy checks, approvals, and the execution record needed to reconstruct the run.

9-section
Audit PDF
review-ready evidence
10
Query templates
compliance prompts
Scoped
Recorded support
source links and qualifications
Source-
grounded
verbatim evidence
Review-
ready
audit evidence export
Evidence chain
Generated explanations are not a substitute for provenance. The operating record should show the evidence, procedure, validation, and authority that produced the decision.
Quote, document, record, or structured input.
Figures and fields retained before model interpretation.
Recommendations operate on grounded facts and explicit rules.
Reconciliation, constraints, approvals, and exceptions are recorded.
Reviewers can reconstruct what happened and why.
Capabilities
Inspect the agent stages, checks and reconciliation events retained for the selected supported path. Confirm trace coverage for the protocol and export.
Inspect the source references and quotations retained with a finding, alongside its interpretation, qualifications and open questions.
Natural-language audit queries powered by self-hosted embeddings inside the customer tenant.
10 pre-built compliance queries for grounding, contradictions, ROI, severity, and recommendations.
9-section export designed to preserve source evidence, validation results, calculations, approvals, and change history for review.
Inspect the documented source support, selected checks and recorded decisions within the supported workflow. Repeating supported checks requires the source companion, specified rules and a compatible receiver.
Query engine understands the validation and reconciliation step, cross-call context, and L2 data types.
Review questions
Review templates help finance, compliance, operators, and auditors examine the run without relying on a narrative reconstruction after the fact.
Findings asserted without verbatim source quotes.
Dollar figures not snapped to L2-verified calculations.
Contradicting findings the validation step should reconcile.
Financial figures that drift across multiple analyses.
Quotes attributed incorrectly to speakers.
Fabricated or unsupported terms.
Severity assignments inconsistent across runs.
Recommendations without supporting evidence.
Cost drivers that cannot trace to source statements.
Where the protocol overrode a finding and why.
Review context
Preserve cost evidence, calculations, methodology, approvals, and decision provenance for accounting-policy assessment.
Provide source grounding, execution records, validation results, control evidence, and change history reviewers can inspect.