Source evidence
Management presentations, data room files, market research, SDRs, customer/vendor data, financials, and operating notes enter the protocol.
Convert management presentations, financials, market research, customer data, and operating evidence into deal risk, named deal breakers, synergy estimates, integration complexity, IC-ready recommendations, and 100-day planning signals. Material figures can carry source quotes, formulas, and confidence so finance, diligence, and operating teams can review the basis rather than rely on a generated assertion. Where diligence ties to payment or IP milestones, Sentinel can translate those conditions into governed approval gates.
Deal verdict
Live47
Deal
risk
$1.7M
Net synergy
Diligence domains
47
Risk
$1.7M
Synergy
12
Findings
0
Breakers
Operating flow
The protocol structures source evidence, applies its method, records management actions, and updates the resulting operating state.
Management presentations, data room files, market research, SDRs, customer/vendor data, financials, and operating notes enter the protocol.
Risks, synergies, obligations, deal breakers, customers, systems, integration dependencies, assumptions, and source citations become mapped.
MCOS calculates deal risk, integration complexity, synergy estimate, confidence, red flags, and go/no-go readiness.
Teams validate deal breakers, assign diligence owners, update synergy assumptions, resolve integration risks, and flag missing sources.
Actions update the risk score, synergy table, integration plan, IC memo, 100-day plan, and evidence package.
Grounded chat over the full diligence record, with per-module launchers. Findings and synergies carry their extracted evidence quote, so the copilot can't assert a figure the data room never stated.
Workspace modules
Dashboards and exports matter. The deeper value is the structured evidence, operating state, decision logic, and management workflow that can be revisited and updated.
Executive view of deal risk, recommendation status, integration complexity, financial summary, source coverage, and upcoming deadlines.
Ranks concentration risk, customer churn risk, integration readiness, management bandwidth, financial exposure, and operational fragility.
Models revenue, cost, operational, and integration synergies with source-linked assumptions and confidence levels.
Identifies and names deal-breaking issues with citations, downstream impact, and required close conditions.
Maps systems, vendors, processes, people, dependencies, timeline, and operational drag before the deal closes.
Converts diligence graph findings into investment committee-ready narrative, recommendations, and evidence-backed decisions.
Management actions
Validations, owner assignments, risk decisions, and approved changes are operating events. They should update the underlying state rather than remain comments beside a static report.
Validate Deal Breaker
Recalculates state
Assign Diligence Owner
Recalculates state
Update Synergy Assumption
Recalculates state
Resolve Integration Risk
Recalculates state
Flag Missing Source
Recalculates state
Operating view
M&A Diligence converts unstructured deal evidence into quantified risk, synergy, complexity, and recommendation signals before the close window expires.
Inside the dashboard
Every diligence run opens as a deal desk. Each module answers a partner-level question, and the verdict updates as conditions clear.
The headline recommendation, deal-risk score, and closing conditions to clear before close.
Banded 0-100 risk gauge, verdict pill
Every finding by category and severity, filterable, with its evidence.
Category-by-severity matrix, filterable register
The upside thesis, each value lever grounded to a figure only where stated.
Value levers on a short, medium, long timeline
Post-close execution: integration risks, hidden liabilities, adjustments.
Complexity meter, mitigation master-detail
The deal desk: negotiation playbook and phased post-close plan.
Lever-chipped playbook, Day-1 / 90 / 100 timeline
Generate from the diligence
Each memo is written live from the full diligence record. Generate the one that matches the module you are in, or open the Deal Copilot to produce any of them and ask grounded follow-ups.
Recommendation, economics, risks, and open conditions in one memo.
Critical and deal-breaker findings ordered by severity.
The upside case for the price, lever by lever.
Day-1, 90-day, and 100-plus plan with owners.
How to play each lever, with asks and conditions of close.
Grounded chat over the full analysis, with per-module launchers.
The whole analysis as a Deck, Sheet, or Memo prompt for your own tool.
Plus a temporal deal timeline: append a follow-up diligence call and the verdict, conditions, and synergies update across calls. Clearing a closing condition is recorded on a tamper-evident audit trail and lifts the verdict.
Why it survives the committee
Findings and synergies carry the extracted evidence quote; dollar values appear only where stated, and qualitative levers say so.
Findings split into closing conditions you can clear and walk-away issues you cannot, so the verdict reflects what is actually fixable.
A named human clears or reopens each condition, recorded on an append-only, SHA-256 hash-chained audit trail.
Clearing a condition recomputes the deal-risk score, so a resolved issue lifts the verdict instead of citing a stale one.
These mechanisms are engineered to enforce accuracy by construction, but the system is under continuous improvement, and defects are corrected as they surface.
Governed output layer
M&A Diligence produces the IC-ready narrative, risk scoring, synergy model, integration complexity assessment, evidence citations, and 100-day planning package.
Output package